Class: Thursday, 1:00 - 3:50 pm, Darwin 308
Instructor: Dr. Hongtao Shi
Lab Assistant: Michael Youmans
Phone: 664-2013
Email: hongtao.shi@sonoma.edu
Office: Darwin 300J
Office Hours: Monday and Thursday 11 - 11:50 am, or by appointment
Course
Description and Goals:
This is a lab based course, satisfying GE,
category B1,
and GE laboratory requirements. By performing these measurements, you will
deepen your understanding of the material in Physics 114 and develop your
experimental technique. Experiments concerning Newtonian mechanics, momentum,
energy conservation, rocketry, simple harmonic oscillations, etc. will be
performed.
Prerequisite:
Previous
or concurrent enrollment in Physics 114.
Text:
No
text is adopted for this course. All lab-related material will be posted on
the web. Make sure you download those material before each lab.
Grading Policy: The laboratory grade will be based on the best twelve experiments (out of 13), which is worth 80%. We will also have three quizzes that are worth 20%.
Term grade A: 90% or above, B: 80-89%, C: 70-79%, D: 60-69%, and F: below 60%.
Prelaboratory Work: Each lab is worth 10 points, including prelaboratory work (1 point) and performing all the required work in the lab (9 points). A worksheet accompanies each experiment with four or five questions to help you prepare for that week's laboratory. You earn this point if it is handed in before the laboratory.
Laboratory
Notebooks:
All write ups are done in the laboratory notebooks. Please purchase a lab notebook
that has the carbonless copy feature. You will tear out the copies and hand
them in at the end of the appropriate laboratory period. They will be graded
and returned to you before the next laboratory. This means that your work on
the experiment and write up is over at the end of the laboratory period. The
notebook is worth a maximum of 90% of the grade (9 points).
Other
Policies: Computer
assisted analysis of the data where appropriate is expected. You will be using
Microsoft Excel to plot your data and perform least square fitting routines
that handle uncertainty estimates. EXCEPT FOR EXTRAORDINARY
CIRCUMSTANCES, ABSENCES BEYOND ONE LAB CAN NOT BE MADE UP.
Laboratory
Notebook Format. Nine points credit.
Always include your name, date and names of laboratory partner(s).
| 1) |
Drawing of Experimental setup |
1 pt |
| 2) |
Record
of raw data obtained with labels |
2 pts |
| 3) |
Analysis of the results including tables, graphs |
2 pts |
| 4) |
Conclusions |
2 pts |
| 5) |
Answer all the questions at end |
2 pts |
1)
A simple sketch is best. This is a useful skill when you design your own experiments.
2)
Your original data should be written directly into your notebook. Plan ahead
and organize your data taking before any measurement. This is best done before
the laboratory period. All data tables need to be labeled with what the quantity
is and the units. A print out of data tables using the computer is fine as long
as you label the quantity measured (time, distance, etc.) and the units (seconds,
meters, etc.).
3)
Data reduction, background subtraction, and error estimates are in this section.
The computer can be used to great advantage to draw the graphs, to do the least
squares fitting, and to provide you with error estimates based on the scatter
in the data. All graphs must have a title and axes labeled with units. The conclusions
drawn from each graph need to be described in complete sentences (one or two
is usually sufficient). A graph with no statement as to what it means is not
going to earn the maximum grade.
4)
A concise summary comparing theory and experiment demonstrates you know what
you are doing and makes for a professional report. Do the results fit the theory
within errors? If the final result is many standard deviations from the expected
value, try to find reasons why. However, the summary should be brief and based
on your experimental results.
5)
Answer any questions at the end of the write up.
Additional
factors:
a)
Have you covered a sufficient range of input parameters to really test the theory?
For example, for a pendulum: have you taken data with very short and very long
pendulums? The test of a theory is more convincing if you use extreme values
of the parameters as well as values in the middle.
b)
The instructor is also looking at your original data to see if you made initial
trials before taking the final data set. Does the technique and final set up
reflect knowledge gained on initial trials? Real science seldom goes right on
the first try.
c)
Are some points repeated to check repeatability? Have you looked over the data
while you are taking it and retaken suspicious points? If you analyze your data
before taking down the equipment, you may be able to spot troublesome points,
and repeat them.
d)
Overall, have you tried during the laboratory to undertake a credible experiment
within the limitations of the equipment available?
Do
discuss the results with your partners, and perhaps the instructor, if the results
seem odd.
Important University policies, such as add/drop classes, cheating and plagiarism, grade appeal procedures, etc. can be found here.
Email me if you have questions or comments.
Last updated: 01/20/07